From: Peter da Silva Date: 19:09 on 27 Jan 2007 Subject: Re: cygwin (was: Excessively grandiose product names) On Jan 26, 2007, at 9:51 PM, Phil Pennock wrote: > I miss Xt; it was butt-ugly but it worked, reliably and portably. It > was cool to be able to aim viewres at something and figure out how to > configure it without having to fight whatever limited options the > programmer might have exposed. I'm probably forgetting a lot of pain, > though. Xaw is pretty good that way, too, and you could use Xaw3d or neXtaw to make it less ugly (or Xaw95 to make it more ugly).
Generated at 10:27 on 16 Apr 2008 by mariachi